(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA103740851; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 14:34:11 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from di.Vinton.COM by mail.webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA103520833; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 14:33:53 -0700
Received: from barnstormer (peter [204.179.185.125]) by di.Vinton.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA28286 for <lightwave@webcom.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 14:26:12 -0700
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 14:26:12 -0700
Message-Id: <199510102126.OAA28286@di.Vinton.COM>
X-Sender: sbailey@mailhost.vinton.COM
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
From: Stephen Bailey <sbailey@vinton.com>
Subject: Re: Toggeling AA on Backgrounds .
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
At 12:45 PM 10/10/95 -0700, Frank wrote:
>How about the possibility of turning of Anti Aliasing for background
>pictures . If you use a previously made animation as background and
>only the new objects must be Antialiased the background also get
>Antialiased and so taking alot of time where it is not necessary .
>
>Maybe a new feature for a future LW release ? :-)
>
It has always been my impression that LW anti-aliasing does not affect the
background image/sequence. It may look as if it is doing an edge-detection
pass on it as well as the geometry in the scene, but it only affects the
geometry (or, I should say, the edges of the geometry in the scene).